* Faculty Council has second thoughts about severance pay language
   
* State revenue forecast better than expected
   
* Schedule set for Benson's spring town hall meetings
   
* Five questions for Daniel Gette
   
* People
   
* Did you know...
   
* Letters to the editor
 
 NEWS FROM ACROSS CU
 
  CU-BOULDER
  Young Egyptian activist to recount details of revolution
 
  UCCS
  Garcia: State's higher ed an economic driver
 
  CU DENVER
  Signs of new branding spring up on campus
 
  ANSCHUTZ MEDICAL CAMPUS
  Match Day lights paths to residency for School of Medicine students
 
  CU FOUNDATION
  What happens when a staff member steps into the shoes of a donor?
 
Download Newsleter in PDF
 

Home
Newsletter Archive
Letters to the Editor
Contact Us

   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   

Forum

Questions about U.S. News' ranking methodology

While it was good to hear news about how well various CU schools have done in the recent U.S. News ranking of graduate programs, it's good to remember that these rankings can cut both ways. 

More important, though, is the issue of methodology. Malcolm Gladwell's recent piece in The New Yorker (excerpted here) provides some serious reasons to take U.S. News rankings with at least a grain of salt.

I'm all for self-congratulation, but let's be careful how much we link our (genuine) merit to U.S. News' money-making contrivance. Too fulsome an embrace of their lack of rigor will imply our own. Let's not.

David Hildebrand
Philosophy
CU Denver

Being penalized for state's financial woes

I have been a state employee for nine years and it has taken me 30 years to find a job I love. However, it is becoming increasingly difficult to survive.

The classified staff employees have not received a raise in three years. Last year, insurance premiums went up and it was decided the employees would pay the state's 2.5 percent to PERA. Taxes have gone up, not to mention gas and food. I feel like I am being penalized for the state's financial problems.

In December, I fell and broke my ankle. I went on leave without pay but now I have to pay back the university for overpayment. I was told I could apply for leave share, but don't count on it. I was denied because I wasn't in the hospital dying. A broken ankle doesn't require hospitalization, but I did require two months of "residential care due to my incapacity to stand or walk."

The leave-sharing policy refers to "an unforeseeable life-altering event beyond the employee's control." I didn't break my ankle on purpose. I required surgery to repair a ligament and they put two screws in my ankle. I applied for short-term disability, which I have not seen yet, and when it comes I will just turn it over to the university. Thank you, state of Colorado, for a job I love.

Barbara Wojcik
Mathematics
CU-Boulder

Forum Archive

Letter Submission Guidelines
The Faculty and Staff Newsletter welcomes letter submissions from current or retired University of Colorado faculty and staff about issues of interest to the university community. Submissions may be edited for length, style and clarity. Anonymous submissions will be neither considered nor published. Please send submissions to newsletter@cu.edu.

Please indicate whether or not you would like to see your comment published in the newsletter as a letter to the editor. Thank you.

Bookmark - Print - Share