* Reminder: Shift in PERA contributions takes effect this month
* CU-Boulder names Boswell interim vice chancellor for diversity
* Ingber to take helm of College of Engineering and Applied Science
* New College of Music program promises opera from ground up
* Five Questions for Robert Kuehler
* More than 60 faculty members earn tenure
* People
* Did you know?
* Letters to the editor
  Performing arts veteran takes helm of Macky Auditorium
  El Pomar gift leads to new name for Science and Engineering atrium
  Shuttle between Denver campuses begins service
  People with rare cancers needed to help scientists leading new program
  Aurora company licenses unusual approach to treating inflammatory disease
   Newsletter Archive
Download Newsleter in PDF
Share your thoughts
Share your opinions

Send your thoughts and suggestions for the Newsletter

CU Board of Regents passes resolution opposing three 2010 ballot measures

Changes to tax revenue streams considered threat to university's state funding

The University of Colorado Board of Regents passed a resolution opposing Amendments 60 and 61 and Proposition 101, which Colorado voters will decide in November.

The resolution, which opposes all the measures, passed 7-2, with Regents Jim Geddes and Tom Lucero dissenting. The majority on the board said they believed the measures would harm the university, which already has sustained significant reductions in state funding, by reducing revenue and prohibiting bond financing.

CU President Bruce Benson has asked for an internal analysis of the specific impact of the measures. The board discussed and voted on the resolution during the public session portion of its annual retreat in Silverthorne.

According to a draft analysis by the Colorado Legislative Council (the nonpartisan research arm of the Colorado General Assembly), the measures have provisions "that affect state and local government finances by decreasing taxes for households and businesses and restricting government borrowing. How these measures work together may require clarification from the state legislature or the courts."

The draft analysis notes that:

  • Amendment 60 would decrease and limit property taxes for individuals and businesses, which would reduce tax revenue for cities, counties, school districts and special districts.
  • Amendment 61 would limit debt by prohibiting the state and its entities from borrowing money.
  • Proposition 101 would reduce the state income tax from 4.63 percent to 3.5 percent.
Bookmark - Print - Share