* Boulder campus monitors ongoing flu cases, issues recommendations
   
* State's higher education chief David Skaggs steps down
   
* CU system receives 131 ARRA grants to date
   
* Five questions for William E. Walker
   
* Health care, research and funding focus of summer legislative efforts
   
* Recent changes to policy now in effect
   
* CU-Boulder releases results of 2009 student safety survey
   
* Seasoned journalist to oversee development of new faculty, staff newsletter
   
* News briefs
   
* People
   
* Did you know?
   
 FORUM
  Letters
  Guest comment
   
 NEWS FROM THE CU SYSTEM
 
  CU-BOULDER
  Sierra magazine names CU-Boulder top 'green' university
 
  UCCS
  Science and Engineering Building earns gold for efficiency and innovation
 
  UC DENVER
  Student wins first Zinke Award for economics paper
 
  ANSCHUTZ MEDICAL CAMPUS
  Ground broken on planned VA medical center
   
  CU FOUNDATION
  Gift for Beth-El College of Nursing
   
  TECH TRANSFER
  Reading software based on CU technology draws national attention
 
 
   Home
   Newsletter Archive
 
Download Newsleter in PDF
 
Please share your comments and/or suggestions

Forum

Insurance companies shouldn't punish prevention

Two medical news items in the Aug. 19 Newsletter garnered my attention. First, the record-breaking SOM class is good news for the university and a key part of the solution to help contain health care costs while increasing availability of care. It takes more doctors to accomplish these two objectives.

Second, the expanded state funding for the Colorado Colorectal Screening Program is literally a life-saver. While a hands-down best-use of public dollars, it also points out the less-than-stellar state of health insurance coverage. And I'm not just talking about those without. As a university employee I have always opted for the default high-deductible coverage (currently Anthem, formerly Great West). In both cases, preventive care coverage includes colonoscopies and is covered 100 percent with one huge exception: If a polyp is found, the procedure is not covered as part of the preventive care coverage. Instead, it becomes an outpatient surgical procedure subject to the deductible. This is wrong and absurd.

I have had two colonoscopies under each company and in both cases I had to fight to get it covered under the preventive care category. I am certain many other CU employees have faced the same battle; I encourage them to contact me so that I can document this shameful practice. My hope is that CU can obtain this benefit through future negotiations with the insurance company so that individuals don't have to go it alone.

Barry Northrop
Assistant Director of Policies and Procedures
Accounting and Business Support
University of Colorado at Boulder

Letter Submission Guidelines
The Faculty and Staff Newsletter welcomes letter submissions from current or retired University of Colorado faculty and staff about issues of interest to the university community. Submissions may be edited for length, style and clarity. Anonymous submissions will be neither considered nor published. Please send submissions to newsletter@cu.edu.

Please indicate whether or not you would like to see your comment published in the newsletter as a letter to the editor. Thank you.

Bookmark - Print - Share